Benson, J. M. 1942. The Porpoising Characteristics of a Planing Surface Representing the Forebody of a Flying-Boat Hull. National Aeronautics and Space Admin Langley Research Center Hampton Va.
Caponnetto, M. 2001. Practical CFD simulations for planing hulls. Process of Second International EuroConference on High Performance Marine Vehicles, HIPER’01: 128-138.
Clement, E. P. and Blount, D. L. 1963. Resistance tests of a systematic series of planing hull forms. Trans. Sname. 71(3): 491-579.
Davidson, K.S. and Locke Jr, F. w. 1943. Some Systematic Model Experiments on the Porpoising Characteristics of Flying-Boat Hulls. Stevens Inst of Tech Hoboken NJ Experimental Towing Tank.
Day J.P. 1952. Planing Boat Porpoising-A Study of the Critical Boundries for a Series of Prismatic Hulls. Thesis submitted to Webb Institute of Naval Architecture.
Doctors, L. J. 1985. Hydrodynamics of high-speed small craft (No. 292).
Ghadimi, P. and Dashtimanesh, A. 2017. Provide a mathematical model for evaluating the effects of a variable tip angle on the performance of planing hulls. Ph.D Thesis Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic).
International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC). 2002. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. 7.5-01-01-01.
International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC). 2011. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. 7.5-02-02-01.
Matveev, K. I. and Bari, G. S. 2016. Effect of deadrise angles on hydrodynamic performance of a stepped hull. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 230(4): 616-622.
Perring, W. G. A. and Glauert, H. 1943. The stability on the water of a seaplane in planing condition. No. 1493. British ARC.
Zeraatgar, H., Ghasemi, H., Moghadas Ahangari, A. A. and Hashemi, S. A. 2017. Investigating the effect of changing the angle of deadrise angle of planing prismatic hull on the resistance, trim and rise up through the model test and empirical formulas (regression).5th. National Conference on fast craft.
