Journal of Marine Science and Technology

Journal of Marine Science and Technology

NITROGEN COMPOUND REMOVING PERFORMANCE OF RECIRCULATING, BIOFLOC-RECIRCULATING, AND BIOFLOC SYSTEMS

Document Type : Original Manuscript

Authors
Artemia and Aquaculture Research Institute, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Abstract
 
ABSTRACT
In this study, three different culture systems, recirculating aquaculture system (RAS), biofloc-RAS (BRAS), and biofloc system (BS) were investigated in terms of water quality characteristics and removal of inorganic nitrogen compounds. All systems had a 250-liter rearing tank. Each RAS had a sedimentation tank, an airlift pump, and a scoria biofilter tank. In the biofloc system, aeration was done by a perforated pipe in the bottom. In the BRAS, a biofloc production tank, an airlift pump, and a sedimentation tank were designed. After preparing the systems, common carp juveniles with a density of 6.25 kg/m3 were stored in each system and farmed for three months. The results showed that the RAS, BRAS, and BS reached a steady state condition in terms of ammonia on days 24, 30, and 36, respectively, and in terms of nitrite, on days 36, 42, and 60, respectively. The average amount of ammonia in the RAS and BS was significantly lower and higher than in other systems, respectively. The mean nitrite in the RAS was significantly lower than in the BRAS and BS. Nitrate values in all systems increased during the study period. In the biofloc system compared with other systems, the mean weight, weight gain, and SGR were significantly lower, whereas, FCR was significantly higher. In general, the RAS and biofloc-RAS performed better than the biofloc system under conditions of negligible water exchange.
 1. INTRODUCTION
Recent droughts forced us to use new technologies in the aquaculture industry to reduce our dependence on water resources. During the past four decades, the recirculating system has been the most common ultra-intensive culture system worldwide (Hisano et al., 2021). In these systems, by using physical and biological treatment units, it is possible to reuse water and produce it with high density (Irani and Agh, 2019). Despite the many advantages of these systems, the high initial investment and operational cost have limited their use, especially in less developed areas.
In recent years, a new technology called biofloc has been developed, which allows the production of fish and shrimp with little water consumption (Avnimelech, 2007). However, the most important problems of these systems are the unsustainability of removing nitrogen compounds and controlling flocs and excess solids. For this reason, other innovations emerged in these systems, and by integrating recirculating systems with biofloc, systems were developed in which the culture units are separate from the biofloc units (De Schryver and Verstraete, 2009). In this study, to use the advantages of both systems and eliminate their disadvantages, recirculating and biofloc systems were combined and a hybrid system was designed in which the biofilter was removed and biofloc was produced outside the rearing tank.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nine systems were designed and implemented in three treatments: 1- recirculating system, 2- recirculating-biofloc system and 3- biofloc system. All systems had a 250-liter fish-rearing tank. Each recirculating system had a sedimentation tank, an airlift pump, and a scoria biofilter tank. In the biofloc system, aeration was done by a perforated pipe in the bottom. Each recirculating-biofloc system had a biofloc production tank, an airlift pump, and a sedimentation tank.
After preparing the systems, common carp juveniles were stocked with a density of 6.25 kg/m3 in each rearing tank and were kept for three months under experimental conditions.
3. RESULTS
Ammonia values in recirculating and recirculating-biofloc systems reached a peak of 1.83 and 2.29 mg/liter, respectively, on day 15 and then decreased. In the biofloc system, ammonia levels peaked (2.21 mg/L) three days earlier, but the decline slope was much slower than in the other systems. The recirculating and recirculating-biofloc and biofloc systems reached a steady state on the 24th, 30th, and 36th days, respectively. The average amount of ammonia in the recirculating system (0.52 mg/L) was significantly lower and in the biofloc system (1.05 mg/L) it was significantly higher than in other systems (Table 1).
Nitrite values in recirculating, recirculating-biofloc and biofloc systems peaked on days 24 (0.66 mg/L), 21 (0.85 mg/L), and 30 (0.86 mg/L), respectively, and then decreased. The nitrite reduction, like ammonia, was faster in the recirculating system than in other systems. So that the recirculating system reached a steady state on the 36th day, whereas this condition occurred in the recirculating-biofloc and biofloc systems on the 42nd and 60th days, respectively.
In the biofloc system compared with other systems, the mean weight, weight gain, and SGR were significantly lower, whereas, FCR was significantly higher.
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
In all systems, ammonia values increased, reached a peak, and then decreased. At the same time as ammonia decreased, nitrite levels increased and decreased after a certain time. Nitrate values had an increasing trend until the end of the research period. Researchers believe that a biological treatment unit is ready to use in recirculating systems when it has reached a steady state (Delong and Losordo, 2012), and a steady state is a condition in which the amounts of ammonia and nitrite in the outlet water are relatively constant (Colt et al., 2006). In general, in the present study, in terms of ammonia, the recirculating, biofloc-recirculating, and biofloc systems reached a steady state on days 24, 30, and 36, respectively, and in terms of nitrite, these systems reached a steady state on days 36, 42, and 60, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the recirculating and recirculating-biofloc systems performed better than the biofloc system in conditions of negligible water exchange. On the other hand, the biofloc-recirculating system can be more economical and easier to manage because it does not need a biofilter system.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to thank the staff of Artemia and Aquaculture Research Institute of Urmia University, especially Mr. Saeed Hajinejad, who helped in the implementation of this research.
REFERENCES
Hisano, H., Barbosa, P.T.L., Hayd, L.A. and Mattioli, C.C. 2021. Comparative study of growth, feed efficiency, and hematological profile of Nile tilapia fingerlings in biofloc technology and recirculating aquaculture system. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(1), pp.60. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02523-z.
Irani, A., Agh, N., 2019. Design and Management Principles of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems, Urmia University, 230 p.
Avnimelech, Y. 2006. Bio-filters: the need for a new comprehensive approach. Aquacultural Engineering, 34, pp. 172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.04.0.
De Schryver, P. and Verstraete, W. 2009. Nitrogen removal from aquaculture pond water by heterotrophic nitrogen assimilation in lab-scale sequencing batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, 100, pp. 1162–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.043.
Colt, J., Lamoureux, J., Patterson, R. and Rogers, G. 2006. Reporting standards for biofilter performance studies. Aquacultural Engineering, 34, pp. 377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.09.002.
DeLong, D.P. and Losordo, T.M., 2012. How to Start a Biofilter. SRAC Publication, 4502, pp. 4.
Keywords

Subjects


Asaduzzaman, M., Wahab, M.A., Verdegem, M.C.J., Huque, S., Salam, M.A. and Azim, M.E. 2008. C/N ratio control and substrate addition for periphyton development jointly enhance freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii production in ponds. Aquaculture, 280(1), pp. 117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.04.019.
Asaduzzaman, M., Wahab, M.A., Verdegem, M.C.J., Benerjee, S., Akter, T., Hasan, M.M. and Azim, M.E. 2009. Effects of addition of tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and substrates for periphyton developments on pond ecology and production in C/N-controlled freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii farming systems. Aquaculture, 287(3), pp. 371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.11.011.
Avnimelech, Y. 2006. Bio-filters: the need for a new comprehensive approach. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), pp. 172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.04.0.
Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. 2006. Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience. Research Policy, 35(10), pp. 1477–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.017.
Azimi, A, Jafaryan, H., Harsij, M., Gholipour, H. and Patimar, R. 2017. Eeffect of C/N different ratios on water quality parameters and growth performance of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings in biofloc system. Journal of Aquaculture Development, 10 (4), pp. 75-89. doi: 20.1001.1.23223545.1395.10.4.10.6. (In Persian).
Bakhshi, F., Rahmani Farah, K., Najdegerami, E.H., Manaffar, R. and Tukmachi, A. 2018. Chemical and quality indices of common carp meat reared in the biofloc system during the refrigerated storage time. Journal of Fisheries Science and Technology, 7(1), pp. 41-48. doi: 20.1001.1.23225513.1396.7.1.9.4. (In Persian).
Brune, D., Schwartz, G., Eversole, A., Collier, J. and Schwedler, T. 2003. Intensification of pond aquaculture and high rate photosynthetic systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 28(1): 65–86. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8609(03)00025-6.
Carroza, C., Hurtado, F. and Gutierrez, X. 2012. Nitrogenated compounds’ biofiltration under alternative bacterium fixation substrates. Latin America Journal of Aquaculture Research, 40(3): 772-785. doi: 103856/vol40-issue3-fulltext-24.
Colt, J., Lamoureux, J., Patterson, R. and Rogers, G. 2006. Reporting standards for biofilter performance studies. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), pp. 377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.09.002.
Crab, R., Avnimelech, Y., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P. and Verstraete, W. 2007. Nitrogen removal techniques in aquaculture for sustainable production. Aquaculture, 270(1), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.006.
DeLong, D.P. and Losordo, T.M., 2012. How to Start a Biofilter. SRAC Publication.
De Schryver, P. and Verstraete, W. 2009. Nitrogen removal from aquaculture pond water by heterotrophic nitrogen assimilation in lab-scale sequencing batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, 100(3), pp. 1162–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.043.
Ebeling, J.M., Timmons, M.B. and Bisogni, J.J. 2006. Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia-nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 257(1), pp. 346–358. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019.
Fleckenstein, L.J., Tierney, T.W. and Ray, A.J. 2018. Comparing biofloc, clear-water, and hybrid recirculating nursery systems (Part II): Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production and water quality dynamics. Aquacultural Engineering, 82, pp. 80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.06.006.
Hisano, H., Barbosa, P.T.L., Hayd, L.A. and Mattioli, C.C. 2021. Comparative study of growth, feed efficiency, and hematological profile of Nile tilapia fingerlings in biofloc technology and recirculating aquaculture system. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(1), 60. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02523-z.
Huguenin, J.E. and Colt, J. 2011. Design and operating guide for aquaculture sea water systems, Second edition. Elsevier Science.
Irani, A., Agh, N., 2019. Design and Management Principles of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. Urmia University. (In Persian).
Irani, A., Hajimoradlo, A., Agh, N., Ghorbani, R. 2016. Application and activation of four types of biofilter media in common carp recirculating aquaculture system. Journal of Aquaculture Development 10(3), pp. 13-25. doi: 20.1001.1.23223545.1395.10.3.3.7. (In Persian).
Karimtabar, F.Z., Jafaryan, H. and Adineh, H. 2019. The effect of commercial probiotics addition in biofloc system: Water quality, feed and growth performance and body composition of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Journal of Aquaculture Sciences, 7(13), pp. 141-151. (In Persian).
Khademi Hamidi, M., Adineh, H., Harsij, M. and Gholipour Kanani, H. 2019. Effects of adding molasses in water and diet of common carp on growth, blood biochemical indices, digestive enzymes and water quality in a biofloc system. Journal of Aquatic Animals Nutrition, 5(1), pp. 25-34. doi: 10.22124/janb.2019.13636.1063. (In Persian).
Lekang, O., 2007. Aquaculture engineering. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
Luo, G.Z., Avnimelech, Y., Pan, Y.F. and Tan, H.X. 2013. Inorganic nitrogen dynamics in sequencing batch reactors using biofloc technology to treat aquaculture sludge. Aquacultural Engineering, 52, pp. 73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.09.003.
Michaud, L., Blancheton, J. P., Bruni, V. and Piedrahita, R., 2006. Effect of particulate organic carbon on heterotrophic bacterial populations and nitrification efficiency in biological filters. Aquaculture Engineering, 34(3), pp. 224-233. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.07.005.
Mugwanya, M., Dawood, M.A.O., Kimera, F. and Sewilam, H. 2021. Biofloc Systems for Sustainable Production of Economically Important Aquatic Species: A Review. Sustainability, 13, pp. 7255. doi: 10.3390/su13137255.
Tabarrok, M., Seyfabadi, S.J., Salehi Jouzani, G. and Younesi, H. 2021. Comparison of biofloc and recirculation aquaculture systems on growth performance, nonspecific immunity and body composition of common carp. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 30(5), pp. 59-68. doi: 20.1001.1.10261354.1400.30.5.5.8. (In Persian).
Timmons, M. B., Ebeling, J. M., Wheaton, F. W., Summerfelt, S. T. and Vinci, B. J. 2001. Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. Cayuga Aqua Ventures, Ithaca.
Timmons, M. B., Holder, J. L. and Ebeling, J. M. 2006. Application of microbead biological filters. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), pp. 332–343. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.07.003.
Torfi, M., Rajabzadeh Ghatrami, E., Mohammadiazarm, H. 2022. Effect of biofloc system on growth indices, body composition and digestive enzymes of juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in different stocking rates. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 31(1), pp. 35-46. doi: 10.22092/isfj.2022.126571. (In Persian).
Wolters, W., Masters, A., Vinci, B. and Summerfelt, S. 2009. Design, loading, and water quality in recirculating systems for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at the USDA ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center (Franklin, Maine). Aquacultural Engineering, 41(2), pp. 60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2009.06.011.
Xu, W., Xu, Y, Su, H., Hu, X., Yang, K., Guoliang Wen, G. and Cao, Y. 2020. Characteristics of ammonia removal and nitrifying microbial communities in a hybrid biofloc-RAS for intensive litopenaeus vannamei culture: a pilot-scale study. Water, 12(11), 3000, pp. 1-17. doi: 10.3390/w12113000.
Volume 24, Issue 2
Autumn 2025
Pages 40-52

  • Receive Date 27 December 2023
  • Revise Date 21 January 2024
  • Accept Date 23 June 2024
  • Publish Date 23 August 2025